Want to learn how to write a persuasive speech? Want to make sure that you persuade your audience without raising resentment? Well, if you use the techniques that you likely learned in school, you will often fail at both of these goals. In high school, you most likely learned that to write a good persuasive speech, you have to do research, list the pros and cons, and then use lots of data to win over your audience. This technique is a terrible way to persuade people.
Most often, it actually causes the other person to want to play "Devil's advocate" and argue with you. In this article, we are going to show you a simple way to win people to your way of thinking without raising resentment. If you use this technique, you audience will actually WANT to agree with you!
Background About How to Write a Persuasive Speech
One of the highest needs of human beings is to be heard and to be understood. So, when you are writing a persuasive speech, it is important t remember that your audience wants you to understand them as much as you want to be understood.
A Simple 3-Step Process to Create a Persuasive Speech
"He that complies against his will, is of his own opinion still." -- Samuel Butler
Step One: Start with an Example or Story
When you write a persuasive speech, stories are vital. Stories and examples have a powerful way to set people at ease. They get the audience interested in the presentation. Stories also help you audience see the concepts you are trying to explain in a visual way. The more details that you put into your story, the more vivid the images being created in the minds of your audience members. This concept isn't mystical or anything. It is science. When we communicate effectively with another person, the purpose is to help the listener picture a concept in his/her mind that is similar to the concept in the speaker's mind. The old adage is that a "picture is worth a 1000 words." Well, an example or a story is a series of moving pictures. So, a well told story is worth thousands of words (facts).
I'll give you an example.
Factual Argument: Seat Belts Save Lives
If I tell you that seat-belts save lives, I can prove that with a bunch of facts. (These are actual statistics from the CDC posted.)
- 53% of all motor vehicle fatalities from last years were people who weren't wearing seat belts.
- People not wearing seat belts are 30 times more likely to be ejected from the vehicle.
- In a single year, crash deaths and injuries cost us over $70 billion dollars.
These are actual statistics. However, when you read each bullet point, you are likely to be a little skeptical. For instance, when you see the 53% statistic, you might have had the same reaction that I did. You might be thinking something like, "Isn't that right at half? Doesn't that mean that the other half WERE wearing seat belts?" When you see the "30 times ore likely" statistic, you might be thinking, "That sounds a little exaggerated. What are the actual numbers?" Looking at the last statistic, we'd likely want to know exactly how the reporter came to that conclusion.
As you can see, if you are a believer that seat belts save lives, you will likely take the numbers at face value. If you don't like seat belts, you will likely nitpick the finer points of each statistic. The facts will not likely persuade you.
Example Argument: Seat Belts Save Lives
About 20 years ago, I was on a trip from West Texas to the Dallas-Ft Worth metroplex. It was late in the evening, and there wasn't a lot of traffic on the highway. If you have ever been on those lonely highways between big cities in Texas, you'll know that there is not a lot of scenery. The terrain was flat, and well, boring. This was back before MP3 players, so I had a stack of five CD's that I had been shuffling through for the last couple of hours. I reached down to switch the CD one-more-time, hit the track that I really wanted to listen to, and then I looked up. When I did, I saw the headlights of an oncoming pick-up truck that had crossed over the center-line. Then everything went black.
I came to a short time later, and I tried to open my door. It was crushed. The windshield, however, was shattered in pieces, so I took my seat belt off and scrambled out the hole where the windshield was just minutes ago. The driver of the truck was a bloody mess, and his leg was pinned under the steering wheel. The firefighters came a few minutes later, and it took them over 30 minutes to cut the metal from around his body to free them. A Sheriff's Deputy saw a cut on my face and asked if I had been in the accident. I pointed to my truck. His eyes became like saucers. "You were in that vehicle?" I nodded. He rushed me to an ambulance. I had actually ruptured my colon, and I had to have surgery. I was down for a month or so, but I survived. In fact, I survived with very little long-term challenges from the accident.
The guy who hit me wasn't so lucky. Because he wasn't wearing a seat belt, the initial impact from the accident was his head on the steering wheel and then the windshield. He had to have a number of serious surgeries to make his face even somewhat resemble his earlier looks. The only reason that he wasn't thrown from the wreck was that his leg got smashed under the dashboard as his body flew upward. It broke his left leg in six places. For me, the accident was a temporary trauma. For him, it was a life-long tragedy. We were both in similar vehicles. We were both involved in the same accident. The only difference was that I was wearing my seat belt, and he wasn't.
The Emotional Difference is the Key
As you can see, there are major difference between the two techniques. The story gives lots of memorable details along with an emotion that captures the audience. If you read both examples, let me ask you a couple of questions. Without looking back up higher on the page, how long did it take the firefighters to cut the other driver from the car? How many CDs did I have? There is a good chance that these two pieces of data came to you really quickly. You likely remembered this data, even though, the data wasn't exactly important to the story.
However, if I asked you how much money was lost last year as a result of traffic accidents, you might struggle to remember that statistic. The CDs and the firefighters were a part of a compelling story that made you pay attention. The money lost to accidents was just a statistic thrown at you to try to prove that a point was true.
The main benefit of using a story, though, is that when we give statistics (without a story to back them up,) the audience becomes argumentative. However, when we tell a story, the audience can't argue with us. The audience can't come to me after I told that story and say, "It didn't take 30 minutes to cut the guy out of the car. He didn't have to have a bunch of reconstructive surgeries. The Deputy didn't say those things to you! The audience can't argue with the details of the story, because they weren't there.
Step 2: After the Story, Now, Give Your Advice
When most people write a persuasive speech, they start with their opinion. Again, this makes the listener want to play Devil's advocate. By starting with the example, we give the listener a simple way to agree with us. They can agree that the story that we told was true. So, now, finish the story with your point or your opinion. "So, in my opinion, if you wear a seat belt, your more likely to avoid serious injury in server crash."
By the way, this technique is not new. It has been around for thousands of years. Aesop was a Greek slave over 500 years before Christ. His stories were passed down verbally for hundreds of years before anyone ever wrote them down in a collection. Today, when you read an Aesop fable, you will get 30 seconds to two minutes of story first. Then, at the conclusion, almost as a post-script, you will get the advice. Most often, this advice comes in the form of, "The moral of the story is..." You want to do the same in your persuasive presentations. Spend most of the time on the details of the story. Then, spend just a few seconds at the end with your moral.
Step 3: End with the Benefit to the Audience
So, the story capture and hold the attention of the audience. The moral of the story reinforces what conclusion you want the audience to draw. The final part of the process is tell the audience how they will benefit from this advice. Remember that the audience is self-centered. (We all are.) So, if you focus on how the audience will benefit from the advice, you will show them how what they want is inline with what you want.
So, the moral of the story is to wear your seat belt. If you do that, you will avoid being cut out of your car and endless reconstructive surgeries.
Now, instead of leaving your audience wanting to argue with you, the are more likely to be thinking, "Man, I don't want to be cut out of my car or have a bunch of facial surgeries."
The process is very simple. However, it is also very powerful.
How to Write a Persuasive Speech Using the "Breadcrumb" Approach
Once you understand the concept above, you can create very powerful persuasive speeches by linking a series of these persuade stories together. I call this the breadcrumb strategy. Basically, you use each story as a way to move the audience closer to the ultimate conclusion that you want them to draw. Each story gains a little more agreement. So, first, just give a simple story about an easy to agree with concept.Next, use an additional story to gain additional agreement. If you use this process three to five time, you are more likely to get the audience to agree with your final conclusion. If this is a formal presentation, just make you bullet points into the persuasive statements and use stories to reinforce the points.
An Example of a Persuasive Speech Using Breadcrumbs
Marijuana Legalization is Causing Huge Problems in Our Biggest Cities
Homelessness is Out of Control in First States to Legalize Marijuana
Last year, my family and I took a mini-vacation to Colorado Springs. I had spent a summer in Colorado when I was in college, so I wanted my family to experience the great time that I had had there as a youth. We were only there for four days, but we noticed something dramatic had happened. There were homeless people everywhere. Keep in mind, this wasn't Denver, this was Colorado City. The picturesque landscape was clouded by ripped sleeping bags on street corners, and trash spread everywhere.
We were downtown, and my wife and daughter wanted to do some shopping. My son and I found a comic book store across the street to browse in. As we came out, we almost bumped into a dirty man in torn close. He smiled at us, walked a few feet away from the door, and lit up a joint. He sat on the corner smoking it. As my son and I walked the 1/4 mile back to the store where we left my wife and daughter, we stepped over and walked around over a dozen homeless people camped out right in the middle of the town. This was not the Colorado that I remembered. From what I've heard, it has gotten even worse in the last year.
So, if you don't want to dramatically increase your homelessness population, don't make marijuana legal in your state.
DUI Instances and Traffic Accidents Have Increased in Marijuana States
I was at the airport waiting for a flight last week, and the guy next to me offered me his newspaper. I haven't read a newspaper in years, but he seemed so nice that I accepted. It was a copy of the USA Today, and it was open to an article about the rise in unintended consequences from legalizing marijuana. Safety officials and police in Colorado, Nevada, Washington, and Oregon, the first four state to legalize recreational marijuana, have reported a 6% increase in traffic accidents in the last few years.
Although the increase (6%) doesn't seem very dramatic, it was notable because the rate of accidents had been decreasing in each of the states for decades prior to the law change. Assuming that only one of the two parties involved in these new accidents was under the influence, that means that people who aren't smoking marijuana are being negatively affected by the legalization.
So, if you don't want to increase your chances of being involved in a DUI incident, don't legalize marijuana.
(Notice how I just used an article as my evidence, but to make it more memorable, I told the story about how I came across the article. It is also easier to deliver this type of data, because you are just relating what you remember about the data, not trying to be an expert on the data itself.)
Marijuana is Still Largely Unregulated
Just before my dad went into hospice care, he was in a lot of pain. He would take a prescription pain-killer before bed to get a relatively good night sleep. One night, I got a frantic call from my mom. Dad was in a catatonic state, wasn't responsive, and his blood pressure had dropped dangerously low. I rushed over to help. At the hospital, we found out that Dad had an unusually high amount of the painkiller in his bloodstream. It turns out that his regular doctor had been on vacation, and the fill-in doctor had prescribed a much higher dosage of the painkiller by accident. His original prescription was 2.5 mg, and the new prescription was 10 mg.
Since dad was in a lot of pain most nights, he almost always took two tablets. He was also on dialysis, so his kidneys weren't filtering out the excess narcotic each day. He had actually taken 20 MG (instead of 5 MG) on Friday night and another 20 mg on Saturday. Shortly after he took his dosage on Sunday night, my mom called me. Ordinarily, he would have had, at max, 15 mg of narcotic in his system. Because of the mistake, though, he had 60 MGs.
My point is that the narcotics that my dad were prescribed were highly regulated medicines under a doctor's care, and a mistake was still made that almost killed him. With marijuana, there is really no way of knowing how much narcotic is in each dosage. So, mistakes like this are much more likely.
So, in conclusion, legalizing marijuana can increase homelessness in your area dramatically, increase the number of impaired drivers, and cause accidental overdoses because of a lax in regulation of the product.
If you use this breadcrumb approach, you can take a controversial topic like legalizing marijuana and create a presentation that is likely to get, at least some agreement. Even if the person listening disagrees with your conclusion, they are still less likely to disagree with the way that you presented your side. So, the person may say something like, I still disagree with you, but I totally see your point. That is still a step in the right direction.
For Real-World Practice in How to Design Persuasive Presentations Join Us for a Class
Our instructors are experts at helping presenters design persuasive speeches. We offer the Fearless Presentations ® classes in cities all over the world about every three to four months. For details about any of the classes, go to our Presentation Skills Class web page.